Tabata Research Brief

In 1996 a researcher named Dr Izumi Tabata conducted a study at Ritsumeikan University in Japan. This study was the first of its kind, scientifically testing the benefits of intermittent anaerobic exercise, now known as High Intensity Interval Training (H.I.I.T.) in contrast with traditional steady-state cardiovascular aerobic exercise. This research brief explains the findings of the study, originally published in the Journal of Medicine in Science in Sports and Exercise

Key Findings and Implications:

  • High-intensity interval training (specifically 20 seconds exercise: 10 seconds rest for 4 minutes) will improve both aerobic and anaerobic systems simultaneously.
  • The four minute 20 second : 10 second protocol is the only proven method to train both aerobic capacity and vo2 max at the same time.
  • Until recently, research has not quantified or identified the benefits of high intensity interval training (HIIT) anaerobic activity.
  • Aerobic training does not change anaerobic capacity

Keywords: Tabata, High Intensity Interval Training, HIIT, Vo2max, aerobic, anaerobic

OVERVIEW

High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) has become a household term in the fitness world over recent years. With the rise in popularity of HIIT exercise programs in contrast with the dwindling interest in traditional steady-state exercise, there is a rising demand for research in the field. Using two study groups, the following research study puts HIIT and steady-state exercise to the test against each other, comparing and contrasting the scientifically recorded evidence of each approach. In particular, the study compares:

  1. 60 minutes of steady-state exercise   vs.
  2. 4 minutes of HIIT- 8 intervals of 20 seconds exercise: 10 seconds rest (Tabata protocol).

METHODS

PARTICIPANTS-
18-24 year old male college students majoring in physical education. Many participants were physically active and members of varsity athletic teams. After receiving detailed information of the purposes, benefits, and risks associated with this study, each student participant provided written consent.

INSTRUMENTS-
Each experiment (pre-test included) was performed on a mechanically braked stationary cycle ergo-meter (Monark).

Oxygen input and carbon dioxide output levels were measured by a mass spectrometer (MGA-1100, Perkin-Elmer Cetus).

RESEARCH DESIGN

This study included two separate experiments, which both lasted 6 weeks in duration. Subjects’ maximal accumulated oxygen deficit and VO2max was measured before, during and immediately after the 6 week study.

While subjects maintained specific rpm for each experiment, the intensity (resistance) on the cycle was modified to reach each subject’s specific VO2max. For example if the goal was to reach 70% of VO2max while maintaining 70rpm but the subject was only reaching 60%, the resistance on the cycle was increased to further challenge the subject until the desired VO2max was maintained.

Prior to each training session, participants performed a 10 minute warmup at 50% of VO2max.

Experiment 1- (Sixty minutes total)

  • 5 days per week for 6 weeks
  • Steady-state 60 minute cycling workout
  • 70% of individual’s VO2max
  • 70rpm on cycle

Experiment 2- (Four minutes total)

  • 5 days per week for 6 weeks
  • (Four days)
    • 8 sets of 20 second exercise at intensity of 170% of VO2max
    • 10 seconds rest between each interval bout
    • 85rpm on cycle (if subject could perform 9 sets of intervals at this speed, exercise intensity was increase by 11 W.
  • (One day)
    • 30 minutes of steady-state cycling followed by 4 non-exhaustive intervals at 170% of VO2max.

PROCEDURE

Pre-tests were performed to determine the following measurements of each subject prior to the first training:

VO2max- Maximum amount of oxygen that a person’s body can process. Measured in milliliters per/kilogram of body weight per/minute.

Anaerobic capacity- Maximum accumulated oxygen deficit during an exhaustive anaerobic sprint exercise.

DATA ANALYSIS

RESULTS

The main finding of this study was that 6 wk of aerobic training at 70%·VO2max improved the VO2max by 5 ml·kg-1·min-1 in moderately trained young men but that the anaerobic capacity, as judged by the maximal accumulated oxygen deficit, did not change. The second finding is that 6 wk of training using high-intensity intermittent exhaustive exercise improved ·VO2max by 7 ml·kg-1·min-1 and the anaerobic capacity by 28%.

Experiment 1-

  • Anaerobic capacity did not change (fig 1)
  • The VO2max increased by 20% (5 ml·kg-1min-1) (fig 2)

Experiment 2-

  • Anaerobic capacity increased by 23% after 4 weeks of training
  • Anaerobic capacity increased by a total of 28% (7 ml·kg-1min-1) after 6 weeks of training (fig 1)
  • VO2max increased significantly during first 3 weeks (fig 2)
  • VO2max increased by 16% in total (fig 2)

 

SUMMARY-

This study demonstrated that 6 weeks of moderate steady-state endurance training did not affect anaerobic capacity. However, 6 weeks of high-intensity interval training (specifically 20 seconds exercise: 10 seconds rest, 4 minutes, 170% VO2max will improve both anaerobic capacity and VO2max simultaneously. Aerobic training does not change anaerobic capacity. This was the first published study to demonstrate an increase in both anaerobic capacity and maximal aerobic power.